Critics Slam Amazon’s ‘Water Constructive’ Pledge as Knowledge Facilities Pressure Native Sources

This story was initially printed by Grist. Join Grist’s weekly newsletter here.

Earlier this 12 months, the e-commerce company Amazon secured approval to open two new data centers in Santiago, Chile. The $400 million enterprise is the corporate’s first foray into finding its information services, which guzzle huge quantities of electrical energy and water so as to energy cloud computing providers and on-line packages, in Latin America — and in one of the vital water-stressed nations on this planet, the place residents have protested against the industry’s expansion.

This week, the tech big made a separate however associated announcement. It plans to put money into water conservation alongside the Maipo River, which is the first supply of water for the Santiago area. Amazon will accomplice with a water know-how startup to assist farmers alongside the river set up drip irrigation techniques on 165 acres of farmland. The plan is poised to preserve sufficient water to produce round 300 properties per 12 months, and it’s a part of Amazon’s marketing campaign to make its cloud computing operations “water constructive” by 2030, that means the corporate’s net providers division will preserve or replenish extra water than it makes use of up.

The reasoning behind this water initiative is obvious: Knowledge facilities require giant quantities of water to chill their servers, and Amazon plans to spend $100 billion to construct extra of them over the subsequent decade as a part of a giant guess on its Amazon Net Providers cloud-computing platform. Different tech firms akin to Microsoft and Meta, that are additionally investing in information facilities to maintain the artificial-intelligence increase, have made similar water pledges amid a rising controversy in regards to the sector’s thirst for water and energy.

Amazon claims that its information facilities are already among the many most water-efficient within the trade, and it plans to roll out extra conservation tasks to mitigate its thirst. Nevertheless, identical to company pledges to achieve “net-zero” emissions, these water pledges are extra complicated than they appear at first look. Whereas the corporate has certainly taken steps to chop water utilization at its services, its calculations don’t account for the huge water wants of the facility crops that hold the lights on at these exact same services. With no bigger dedication to mitigating Amazon’s underlying stress on electrical energy grids, conservation efforts by the corporate and its fellow tech giants will solely sort out a part of the issue, in response to consultants who spoke to Grist.

The highly effective servers in giant information facilities run sizzling as they course of unprecedented quantities of knowledge, and maintaining them from overheating requires each water and electrical energy. Somewhat than attempt to hold these rooms cool with conventional air-conditioning items, many firms use water as a coolant, working it previous the servers to sit back them out. The facilities additionally want enormous quantities of electrical energy to run all their servers: They already account for round 3 % of U.S. energy demand, a quantity that might more than double by 2030. On high of that, the coal, gasoline, and nuclear energy crops that produce that electrical energy themselves eat even bigger portions of water to remain cool.

Will Hewes, who leads water sustainability for Amazon Net Providers, advised Grist that the corporate makes use of water in its information facilities so as to save on energy-intensive air-con items, thus decreasing its reliance on fossil fuels.

“Utilizing water for cooling in most locations actually reduces the quantity of power that we use, and so it helps us meet different sustainability objectives,” he mentioned. “We may at all times determine to not use water for cooling, however we wish to, loads, due to these power and effectivity advantages.”

To be able to save on power prices, the corporate’s information facilities must evaporate hundreds of thousands of gallons of water per 12 months. It’s exhausting to say for positive how a lot water the information heart trade consumes, however the ballpark estimates are substantial. One 2021 examine found that U.S. information facilities consumed round 415,000 acre-feet of water in 2018, even earlier than the artificial-intelligence increase. That’s sufficient to produce round one million common properties yearly, or about as a lot as California’s Imperial Valley takes from the Colorado River every year to develop winter greens. One other examine discovered that information facilities operated by Microsoft, Google, and Meta withdrew twice as a lot water from rivers and aquifers as your complete nation of Denmark.

It’s nearly sure that this quantity has ballooned even greater in recent times as firms have constructed extra facilities to maintain up with the artificial-intelligence increase, since AI packages akin to ChatGPT require huge quantities of server actual property. Tech firms have constructed lots of of latest information facilities in the previous couple of years alone, and they’re planning lots of extra. One current estimate discovered that ChatGPT requires an average-sized bottle of water for each 10 to 50 chat responses it gives. The on-site water consumption at any considered one of these firms’ information facilities may now rival that of a major beverage company akin to PepsiCo.

Amazon doesn’t present statistics on its absolute water consumption; Hewes advised Grist the corporate is “centered on effectivity.” Nevertheless, the tech big’s water utilization is probably going decrease than a few of its rivals — partly as a result of the corporate has constructed most of its information facilities with so-called evaporative cooling techniques, which require far much less water than different cooling applied sciences and solely activate when temperatures get too excessive. The corporate pegs its water utilization at round 10 % of the trade common, and in temperate places akin to Sweden, it doesn’t use any water to chill down information facilities besides throughout peak summer season temperatures.

Corporations can scale back the environmental impression of their AI enterprise by constructing them in temperate areas which have loads of water, however they have to steadiness these effectivity considerations with considerations about land and electrical energy prices, in addition to the have to be near main prospects. Latest research have discovered that data center water consumption in the U.S. is “skewed towards water confused subbasins” in locations just like the Southwest, however Amazon has clustered much of its business farther east, particularly in Virginia, which boasts cheap power and monetary incentives for tech companies.

“A variety of the places are pushed by buyer wants, but additionally by [prices for] actual property and energy,” mentioned Hewes. “Some massive parts of our information heart footprint are in locations that aren’t tremendous sizzling, that aren’t in tremendous water confused areas. Virginia, Ohio — they get sizzling in the summertime, however then there are massive chunks of the 12 months the place we don’t want to make use of water for cooling.”  Even so, the corporate’s growth in Virginia is already inflicting considerations over water availability.

To mitigate its impacts in such basins, the corporate additionally funds dozens of conservation and recharge tasks just like the one in Chile. It donates recycled water from its information facilities to farmers, who use it to irrigate their crops, and it has additionally helped restore the rivers that offer water-stressed cities akin to Cape Town, South Africa; in northern Virginia, it has labored to install cover crop farmland that may scale back runoff air pollution in native waterways. The corporate treats these tasks the way in which different firms deal with carbon offsets, counting every gallon recharged towards a gallon it consumes at its information facilities. Amazon mentioned in its most recent sustainability report that it’s 41 % of the way in which to assembly its purpose of being “water constructive.” In different phrases, it has funded tasks that recharge or preserve slightly over 4 gallons of water for each 10 gallons of water it makes use of.

However regardless of all this, the corporate’s water stewardship purpose doesn’t embody the water consumed by the facility crops that offer its information facilities. This consumption may be as a lot as three to 10 instances as giant because the on-site water consumption at an information heart, in response to Shaolei Ren, a professor of engineering on the College of California, Riverside, who research information heart water utilization. For example, Ren pointed to an Amazon data center in Pennsylvania that depends on a nuclear power plant less than a mile away. That information heart makes use of round 20 % of the facility plant’s capability.

“They are saying they’re utilizing little or no water, however there’s a giant water evaporation occurring simply close by, and that’s for powering their information heart,” he mentioned.

Corporations like Amazon can scale back this secondary water utilization by counting on renewable power sources, which don’t require anyplace close to as a lot water as conventional energy crops. Hewes says the corporate has been attempting to “handle down” each water and power wants by way of a separate purpose of working on 100 percent renewable energy, however Ren factors out that the corporate’s information facilities want round the clock energy, which implies intermittently accessible renewables like photo voltaic and wind farms can solely go to date.

Amazon isn’t the one firm coping with this downside. CyrusOne, one other main information heart agency, revealed in its sustainability report earlier this 12 months that it used greater than eight instances as a lot water to supply energy because it did on-site at its information facilities.

“So long as we’re reliant on grid electrical energy that features thermoelectric sources to energy our services, we’re not directly chargeable for the consumption of enormous quantities of water within the manufacturing of that electrical energy,” the report mentioned.

As for replenishment tasks just like the one in Chile, they too will solely go a part of the way in which towards decreasing the impression of the information heart explosion. Even when Amazon’s cloud operations are “water constructive” on a world scale, with tasks in lots of the similar basins the place it owns information facilities, that doesn’t imply it gained’t nonetheless compromise water entry in particular watersheds. The corporate’s information facilities and their energy crops should withdraw extra water than the corporate replenishes in a given space, and replenishment tasks in different aquifers world wide gained’t tackle the bodily penalties of that particular overdraft.

“If they can seize among the rising water and clear it and return to the group, that’s higher than nothing, however I feel it’s probably not decreasing the precise consumption,” Ren mentioned. “It masks out plenty of actual issues, as a result of water is a very regional situation.”

Correction: This story has been corrected to make clear that Amazon’s “water constructive” pledge applies solely to its net providers division.

This text initially appeared in Grist. Grist is a nonprofit, impartial media group devoted to telling tales of local weather options and a simply future. Study extra at Grist.org.